Missile attack by Iran on the US base in Qatar || Iran took revenge on America || What happens next?
Assalamu Alaikum. A short while ago, a U.S. base in Qatar was attacked. Iranian missiles entered through Qatari airspace and struck the U.S. base. It is being reported that at least 10 missiles were launched, of which three directly hit the base. The question now arises: why did Iran carry out this attack on Qatar at this moment? Qatar has been one of Iran’s closest allies among the Arab states — arguably the closest one. And now, Iran has launched missile attacks on that very country.
The big questions now are— why were so many missiles launched through Qatari airspace? How effective was Qatar’s air defense system — how many missiles did they manage to intercept?
Through this missile strike on the U.S. base, what message is Iran trying to send? Is Iran looking to escalate this into a full-scale war, committing 100% of its military capability? Or is this strike intended to send a different, strategic message?
If you have answers or insights to these questions, please do share them with us.
So, we can say that Qatar’s air defense system successfully destroyed several of the missiles.
There was already a warning that an attack might happen — which is why Qatar was advised to be prepared, and the U.S. bases were asked to be evacuated in advance.
That’s why Iran informed Qatar in advance: ‘Brother, I will carry out this strike from your country. Please prepare accordingly, so that the casualties and damage are minimized.’
It seems that the purpose here was more to send a message — rather than to cause major destruction.
Air defense systems were kept on alert.
Meanwhile, reports also confirm that Iran has launched missile strikes on Al-Asad Airbase in Iraq.
So, these strikes were carried out simultaneously in Qatar and Iraq.
However, Iraqi officials have stated that no Iranian drone or missile attack has occurred yet at the Al-Asad Airbase in Iraq.
The reason is that whether Iran admits it or not, if there are several attacks, and if any passenger plane gets hit, the consequences would be severe.
According to reports, oil prices fell by 6%, down to $69.5 per barrel, the lowest in a week.
This is not a good thing at all, and it’s not right for us to use these kinds of tactics. The natural question that arises is: what happened to Trump’s promise to completely end Iran’s nuclear program? To destroy Iran’s nuclear project? We are supposed to be the greatest power, and we would finish off Iran’s nuclear project. But ending Iran’s nuclear program will not bring peace to the world. Until now, who was foaming at the mouth saying “nuclear, nuclear” all the time? The President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Israel.
Now, Russia’s Medvedev has just said once that Iran’s neighboring countries are ready to provide nuclear weapons to Iran. And that has already caused some tears and complaints. Putin has now become the boss. Well, Putin is the boss. That’s Trump’s story. I know some of you may feel bad about me laughing at this, but honestly, when I see all this, I can’t help but laugh.
Then, [music] China says, China tells Iran’s ambassador there that, “Look brother, whatever has happened, has happened. We don’t want to escalate this situation any further.” China is saying this. Now if Russia also says the same thing, then we can understand that, somehow, both sides are okay...
“They hit us, we hit back — that’s how it is. So now, let’s sit down and have a discussion. And to me, this seems to be the main purpose of the attack. Just like the President of the United States said after attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities: ‘We have destroyed those facilities. Now we are safe.’
Iran, too, and its top military officials are saying that they have destroyed the American base in Qatar. They say, ‘We have destroyed it. Now we are safe. We have taken revenge for the attacks on us. The bombs that were dropped on us, we have counted and returned the same number of bombs to America.’
That’s it — now we are peaceful. Given this situation, I think you can sleep peacefully tonight. What seems to be the case is that this counterattack was done after prior intelligence and information. It was more or less expected that a counterattack like this would come.
Now, despite this counterattack, what is the real big problem? The big problem is that in this region, some non-state actors have access to missiles. Non-state actors — some might call them terrorist groups, some might call them proxy groups...”
Some call them the Axis of Resistance, some call them the Axis of [something else], some call them by other names. But they have missiles. They have many missiles. If I say nuclear weapons, that would be wrong — they have missiles. Now, Iran is launching missiles — say two missiles were launched at two locations in Qatar.
If any one of these groups suddenly launches three or four missiles at the United Arab Emirates, whether they hit or miss, or if they launch missiles at Kuwait or Jordan, what would happen?
This would trigger a reciprocal counter-reaction — a retaliatory attack. This is a response. Iran needed to show a response, and it has done so. Just like America needed to show that it attacked Iran’s nuclear sites.
But if someone goes beyond this reaction and deliberately launches, say, five missiles to sabotage the situation, then what happens?
This is the big problem here. And this is not necessarily from proxy groups only. Someone from Israel’s side could also do this, because Israel wants a major conflict here — so that America gets more deeply involved.
Anyway, in light of this situation, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq have all closed their airspace. Attacks are now happening in Tehran, and there are reports of attacks in Tabriz as well. These are the reports coming in. So far, no casualties or injuries have been reported from the Iranian attack on the American base located in Qatar. The American military officials have confirmed that according to their latest information, no American bases in any country other than Qatar have been attacked.
The question is, was the attack in Qatar just a show? It can be said it was somewhat a show. In international terms, this is known as the “rules of engagement.” Meaning, if you slap me at a certain level, I have the right to slap you back at the same level, and if I do, then things remain balanced and a discussion can follow. We saw this in the Iran-Pakistan incident, where Pakistan attacked Iran, and then Iran retaliated by attacking Pakistan. Some bases and people were killed or injured during that exchange.
This is the latest situation. Let’s see what happens tonight. We are living in a time where events that would normally take months are happening every minute, every hour, every day. Stay well and healthy. Allah Hafiz.
Missile attack by Iran on the US base in Qatar is a major event, clearly part of Iran’s retaliation against America. This has caused significant tension in global politics and the security situation in the Middle East. What happens next could include several possibilities:
-
Increased regional tension: The strain between Iran and America may intensify further. Additionally, countries like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf states may heighten their security alertness.
-
Tit-for-tat attacks: As seen before, the US or its allies might take retaliatory military action against Iran.
-
Path to diplomatic talks: Major powers such as China, Russia, and the European Union may try to resolve the issue through diplomatic negotiations instead of direct military conflict.
-
Instability in oil markets: This Middle Eastern crisis could cause fluctuations and instability in oil prices, affecting the global economy.
-
Role of terrorist/proxy groups: Various proxy or non-state groups could become more active in this situation, further complicating the scenario.
Therefore, upcoming developments will largely depend on international diplomacy—how major powers manage their actions to prevent the situation from escalating further. For now, everyone remains on high alert, and the situation can change rapidly at any moment.
Would you like me to provide a more detailed analysis of this situation?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment